SCP-173 is intimidating because it's more intriguing than scary at first sight, but what it can do is nothing short of simply terrifying. It isn't scary, it isn't interesting, it's a laughable attempt to make something not intimidating, intimidating. I would have much preferred the 173 from Unity or SCP Illustrated/Fragmented Minds, since they differ from the original design just enough, while still keeping some key details, and the spirit of the original design. I find it funny on how everyone has to argue about this sort of things without realizing that SCP is a /x/ creepypasta at the end of the day, no matter how serious you want to take it as, its on the same level as Suicide Mouse and Jeff the Killer.
Whether OP "stole" the image or not, it doesn't matter because he's nearly 40 years old now and has no idea about the drama and garbage that is the modern SCP wiki. No matter what the post is describing, its all related to the one image posted along with it, and without that image, the post isn't describing anything besides Untitled 2004.
The reason why people dislike the new SCP-173 model is because it has nothing to do with SCP-173. The SCPs housed at Site-02 do not match those of the wiki, yet all of the planned redesigns besides SCP-173 were based off of the rewrites on the wiki. Site-02 is a literal carbon copy of Site-19, only slightly different in some areas. SCP:SL's lore doesn't make much sense to begin with. The SCP-173 creepypasta was just to give the image a creepy backstory, like the other creepypastas being written at the time. The artist who made SCP-173 probably posted it on a public website which the OP used in his SCP-173 post. Originally posted by Engineer Gaming:The original poster of the SCP-173 Creepypasta did not steal the image. SCP-173 is meant to be a scary sculpture and that is it.
We also need to understand that SCPSL has its own lore and elaborates a lot on the original articles without leaving the core concepts of the SCP behind. I understand people may not like it at first, but i feel that hate is based on a lack of understanding of SCP-173. There is seriously nothing wrong at all with Matthew. "Constructed from concrete and rebar with traces of Kylon brand spray paint." That's it, that is all 173 is described as. What Matthew is based off is entirely based on the article. Don't treat the original author as some sort of genius that went through piles of artwork for the perfect SCP-173 image. The original writer of SCP-173 even misspelled SCP multiple times in the original short story. The original writer stole the sculpture/art piece without the artists permission. There was no true in depth complex thought put into that original SCP short story. The person who made the original SCP-173 short story most likely searched up "scary sculpture" on Bing.
0 kommentar(er)
